Difference between revisions of "Design of programmes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Diego Failla (talk | contribs) |
Diego Failla (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Description == | == Description == | ||
| − | It is a qualitative indicator that shows appropriateness of intended learning outcomes, teaching and assessment methods. It provides clear and level-specific learning outcomes, and coherence with teaching and assessment methods. | + | It is a '''qualitative''' indicator that shows appropriateness of intended learning outcomes, teaching and assessment methods. It provides clear and level-specific learning outcomes, and coherence with teaching and assessment methods. |
| − | HEIs should provide | + | HEIs should provide strategies to assess and guarantee that during programmes design. |
| − | As far as the level of decision making is concerned, it is an operational indicator and falls within [[Teaching & Learning]] scope. | + | As far as the level of decision making is concerned, it is an '''operational''' indicator and falls within [[Teaching & Learning]] scope. |
== Decision-making uses == | == Decision-making uses == | ||
* Review degree programme curriculum. | * Review degree programme curriculum. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:32, 18 November 2021
Description
It is a qualitative indicator that shows appropriateness of intended learning outcomes, teaching and assessment methods. It provides clear and level-specific learning outcomes, and coherence with teaching and assessment methods.
HEIs should provide strategies to assess and guarantee that during programmes design.
As far as the level of decision making is concerned, it is an operational indicator and falls within Teaching & Learning scope.
Decision-making uses
- Review degree programme curriculum.